Started by Hypersonic ·
2007-12-18 00:05 UTC ·
7 replies · SMF topic #118
Hypersonic
2007-12-18 00:05 UTC
I am new to what you have, glad to see it being carried on....
Can anyone give me the run down on the differences?
Thanks, Bob.
owenwengerd
2007-12-18 03:38 UTC
Welcome aboard, Bob. The major difference, of course, is that OpenDCL is free and open source. Every OpenDCL user is part of the development and testing team. I can't speak to functional differences as I'm not familiar with the revived ObjectDCL, but I believe they have an evaluation version that you can download.
Hypersonic
2007-12-19 03:32 UTC
thank you !
cadplayer
2012-08-08 06:21 UTC
Sorry I post to an old thread, I have only question, why doesn´t use DCL which is incorporated in Autocad a more attraktiv editor to create a template form.
I like more OpenDCL some beginners.
Regards Dirk
fred_tomke
2012-08-08 06:34 UTC
Hi, cadplayer which question shall we answer for you?
Regards, Fred
cadplayer
2012-08-08 07:18 UTC
Maybe stupid or superfluous if I was thinking than I begin with a DCLlanguage I compared DCL, OpenDCL and ObjectDCL. The first two are for free. ObjectDCL you have to pay a minimi budget.
In DCL looks like a template form as this example:
// Chain.dcl Draw Chains via Dialog
Chain : dialog {
label = "Chain Options";
: row {
: column {
spacer_1;
: image_button {
key = "Chn_ICON";
height = 8;
// width = 20;
aspect_ratio = 1.50;
}
}
// spacer_1;
: column {
: edit_box {
label = "Chain Size";
mnemonic = "S";
key = "Chn_sz" ;
edit_width = 8;
}
: boxed_column {
label = "Chain Type";
: column {
: row {
: radio_button {
label = "Heavy";
mnemonic = "H";
key = "Chn_H";
}
: radio_button {
label = "Medium";
mnemonic = "M";
key = "Chn_M";
}
}
But it´s little bit complicate to understand without any editor.
So I prefer OpenDCL, it´s more easier to use or I missed something?
Dirk
fred_tomke
2012-08-08 08:44 UTC
cadplayer
2012-08-08 09:37 UTC
cheers for answer. No help I needed... ::)